2 Comments

I don't even think you need to provide any data on vaccine injuries or deaths to those under the age of, say, 30. Just accurately and properly report the risks of dying "from" Covid in these age categories.

I've written about one comprehensive study in the UK where researchers looked at deaths from Covid in the first year of the pandemic among UK children (0 to 17). If you take out the few deaths from children who had severe or "life-altering" illnesses, only six "healthy" children died from Covid in the first 12 months of the pandemic. There are approximately 12 million children in the UK, maybe 11.75 million who do not have "life-altering" medical conditions. This means the odds a "healthy" UK child would die "from" Covid are about 6-in-11.75 million (or a little less than 1-in-2 million mortality risk).

Do we really need to vaccinate approximately 11 million kids to (maybe) prevent one or two of these six deaths?

The odds a random person will get struck by lightning in a given year in the U.S. are about 1-in-700,000. So a random citizen's odds of getting struck by lighting are almost three times greater than the probability a healthy child will die from Covid in the same year.

We're vaccinating healthy kids who literally have a 0.000 percent chance of dying from Covid. You have to go out to FOUR decimal points to pick up the mortality "risk."

Expand full comment
author

The risks of myocarditis to young people, especially males, far outweigh the risks of Covid. It's criminal to inject them.

Expand full comment