I recently finished reading through the Bible twice in the New International Version, which I like. This post will examine the concept of “Manifest Destiny” which has philosophical roots in the Bible, and how it relates to the Great Reset, the Plutocrats’ attempt to take over the world. First, let’s review “Manifest Destiny” with ChatGPT:
"Manifest Destiny" was a widely held belief in the 19th century United States that it was the nation's destiny and right to expand its territory across the North American continent. This expansion was seen as not only inevitable but also divinely ordained and morally justified. The term "Manifest Destiny" itself was coined by journalist John L. O'Sullivan in an 1845 article, but the idea had been prevalent in American thinking since the early 1800s.
The concept of Manifest Destiny was grounded in several key beliefs and motivations:
1. **God-Given Mission:** Many Americans believed that they had a God-given mission to spread their civilization, culture, and democratic ideals from the Atlantic to the Pacific Ocean. They saw their expansion as a moral obligation to bring progress and enlightenment to the western frontier.
2. **Territorial Expansion:** As the population of the United States increased and more settlers moved westward, there was a desire for new lands and resources. The belief in Manifest Destiny justified territorial expansion, including the annexation of Texas, the Oregon Territory, and the Mexican Cession (territories acquired from Mexico after the Mexican-American War).
3. **Nationalism:** Manifest Destiny was intertwined with a strong sense of nationalism and pride in the growing nation. Americans believed that their form of government and way of life were superior and should be extended to all regions within the country's reach.
4. **Economic Interests:** Expansion was also driven by economic interests, such as access to valuable resources, fertile lands for agriculture, and opportunities for trade and commerce.
5. **Population Pressure:** As the eastern regions of the United States became more populated, some believed that westward expansion was necessary to relieve population pressures and prevent social and economic problems.
The idea of Manifest Destiny had significant implications for indigenous peoples and other communities living in the western territories. The expansion led to conflicts and the displacement of Native American populations from their ancestral lands as well as the acquisition of Mexican territory through war. It also played a role in shaping U.S. foreign policy and relations with other nations, as the desire for territorial expansion extended beyond the North American continent.
While Manifest Destiny had a profound impact on the growth of the United States, it also sparked debates about the justifications for expansion, the treatment of indigenous populations, and the morality of American imperialism. It remains a complex and controversial aspect of American history.
The concept of “Manifest Destiny” shares a philosophical basis in the conquests of the Israelis in the Old Testament, the idea that the conquest is a God-given mission with an implied right to the conquered territory, often with the requirement from God to eliminate the inhabitants. From ChatGPT:
In the Old Testament, there are instances where the Israelites were commanded by God to engage in military conquests to take over new lands and eliminate the existing inhabitants. These episodes are often referred to as "Holy Wars" or "Conquest Narratives." One prominent example is the conquest of Canaan, which is detailed in the books of Joshua and Judges. Here are some instances of such conquests:
1. Conquest of Jericho (Joshua 6): After the death of Moses, Joshua led the Israelites in the conquest of the Promised Land. The city of Jericho was the first target. The Israelites marched around the city for six days, and on the seventh day, they circled the walls seven times, and with the sound of trumpets, the walls of Jericho collapsed. The Israelites destroyed the city and its inhabitants.
2. Conquest of Ai (Joshua 8): Following the victory at Jericho, the Israelites attacked the city of Ai. After an initial setback due to disobedience, they were successful in capturing and destroying the city and killing its inhabitants.
3. Conquest of Canaan (Various): Throughout the books of Joshua and Judges, there are accounts of the Israelites engaging in wars with various tribes and peoples in Canaan. These include the Canaanites, Amorites, Hittites, Perizzites, Jebusites, and others. The Israelites were often commanded to utterly destroy the people living in these cities and take possession of their lands.
4. Slaughter of the Amalekites (1 Samuel 15): King Saul was commanded by God through the prophet Samuel to completely destroy the Amalekites, sparing no one and not even their livestock. However, Saul did not fully obey, and he spared the Amalekite king and the best of the livestock. As a result, God rejected Saul as king.
It's important to note that these accounts are ancient historical narratives, and interpretations and opinions about them may vary. Some view these conquests as divinely sanctioned actions in the context of the time, while others see them as problematic and ethically challenging. Modern discussions often raise questions about the nature of violence, justice, and the historical accuracy of these events. It is essential to approach these texts with an awareness of their historical and cultural context.
I asked ChatGPT for examples of wars started by peoples seeking more living space, or lebensraum:
The concept of seeking more space or "Lebensraum" has been a driving force behind various wars and conflicts throughout history. Here are some examples of wars fought by peoples seeking territorial expansion or additional living space:
1. **Nazi Germany's Expansionism (World War II)**: Adolf Hitler's Nazi Germany sought to establish a vast empire in Europe and beyond, driven by the ideology of "Lebensraum" for the German people. This expansionist policy was a significant factor leading to the outbreak of World War II. Germany's aggressive actions led to the invasion of Poland in 1939, marking the beginning of the war.
2. **Russian Expansion in Siberia**: Over several centuries, the Russian Empire expanded eastward into Siberia, driven by the desire for more land and resources. This expansion was often accompanied by military campaigns against indigenous peoples and other states in the region.
3. **Manifest Destiny and the Mexican-American War**: As mentioned earlier, the belief in Manifest Destiny was a motivation for the territorial expansion of the United States. The Mexican-American War (1846-1848) was fought as part of this expansionist policy, resulting in the acquisition of large territories in the western and southwestern parts of the modern-day United States.
4. **Japanese Imperialism in Asia**: In the early 20th century, Japan pursued an aggressive policy of expansion in Asia, seeking to secure more space and resources for its growing population and industrial needs. This expansion led to conflicts with China and other Asian countries, culminating in Japan's involvement in World War II.
5. **Roman Expansion**: The Roman Republic and later the Roman Empire engaged in numerous military campaigns to expand their territory and influence across the Mediterranean and beyond. These wars included conflicts with neighboring civilizations such as the Punic Wars against Carthage and conquests in Gaul, Britain, and the eastern Mediterranean.
6. **Manifest Destiny and Native American Wars**: The westward expansion of the United States during the 19th century resulted in conflicts with Native American tribes. The American government and settlers sought to expand their territory, leading to the displacement and violence against indigenous populations.
7. **Russian Expansion in Crimea and Central Asia**: In the 19th century, the Russian Empire expanded southward into Crimea and Central Asia, seeking to establish control over strategic territories and access to warm-water ports.
These examples demonstrate how the pursuit of more space, resources, and "Lebensraum" has been a significant factor behind various wars and conquests in history. In many cases, these expansionist policies have had profound and often negative consequences for the peoples and regions affected by the conflicts.
My working hypothesis is that “the Plutocrats,” as represented by the World Economic Forum primarily, are seeking lebensraum by depopulation and world war, believing that their control of the Western banking system (and ultimately a world central bank currency) will enable them to corral whatever resources they need as the systems they are mortally wounding fail in various places. Food shortages, power grid failures, plagues of various lethalities, poisonings via corrupted public health systems’ injections of mandated poison shots, communications and Internet blackouts, and other “5th generation” weapons are being employed.
I next asked ChatGPT about cases where the Israelites failed in battles of conquest:
In the Old Testament, there are instances where the Israelites faced defeat in their military conquests or battles. These defeats occurred for various reasons, including disobedience to God's commands, lack of faith, strategic mistakes, and the strength of their opponents. Here are a few examples:
1. **Defeat at Ai (Joshua 7)**: After the miraculous victory at Jericho, the Israelites suffered a humiliating defeat at the hands of the small city of Ai. The reason for their defeat was disobedience to God's instructions. A man named Achan had taken forbidden spoils from Jericho against God's command, which brought a curse upon the Israelite camp. Joshua and the people had to deal with the sin before they could proceed with further victories.
2. **Defeat at the Battle of Bethel (Judges 1:22-25)**: In the book of Judges, after the death of Joshua, the Israelites continued to fight to possess the Promised Land. However, they faced defeat in some battles due to their failure to drive out the Canaanite inhabitants entirely, as God had commanded. At the Battle of Bethel, the tribe of Joseph was defeated because they could not drive out the inhabitants of the city.
3. **Defeat at the Battle of Aphek (1 Samuel 4)**: During the time of the judges, the Israelites were defeated by the Philistines at the Battle of Aphek. The Ark of the Covenant was taken from them, and thousands of soldiers were killed. The defeat was attributed to the Israelites' presumption that simply bringing the Ark into battle would guarantee them victory, without considering their spiritual condition or the will of God.
4. **Defeat against the Amalekites and Canaanites (Numbers 14)**: In the early stages of their journey through the wilderness, the Israelites were hesitant to enter the Promised Land due to fear of the inhabitants and lack of faith in God's promises. As a consequence of their disbelief, God declared that the generation that doubted Him would not enter the land. When they later tried to take possession without God's blessing, they were defeated by the Amalekites and Canaanites.
These examples highlight the importance of obedience, faith, and reliance on God's guidance in the conquests and battles of the Israelites. Whenever they strayed from following God's commands and relied solely on their own strength, they faced defeat and consequences for their actions.
So, in the modern era, what are the conditions under which one can say that a war is justified before God? I take as the primary commandments of God through Jesus Christ to be, “‘Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind.’ This is the first and greatest commandment. And the second is like it: 'Love your neighbor as yourself.’” The Christian theory of the just war is summarized by ChatGPT:
The theory of the just war is a set of ethical principles and criteria within Christian theology that seeks to determine when the use of force in warfare can be considered morally justifiable. It originated from early Christian thinkers such as Augustine of Hippo and Thomas Aquinas, who sought to reconcile the teachings of Christianity with the reality of warfare and the need for self-defense.
The just war theory is divided into two main parts: the principles for going to war (jus ad bellum) and the principles for conducting war (jus in bello).
**1. Jus ad bellum (Justification for going to war):**
a. **Just Cause**: A just war must have a legitimate reason for being waged. This includes self-defense against aggression, protection of innocent life, defense of a nation's sovereignty, or redressing a severe wrong or injustice.
b. **Right Intention**: The intention behind going to war must be morally upright. It should be to establish peace, protect the innocent, or correct an injustice, rather than driven by revenge or conquest.
c. **Legitimate Authority**: Only competent and legitimate authorities, such as governments or international bodies, have the right to declare war, not individual groups or private parties.
d. **Last Resort**: War should be the last resort after all peaceful means of resolving the conflict have been exhausted or are deemed to be futile.
e. **Probability of Success**: There should be a reasonable chance of success in achieving the just cause, and the potential benefits of winning the war should outweigh the potential harm caused.
**2. Jus in bello (Conduct of war):**
a. **Proportionality**: The force used in the war should be proportional to the just cause. The harm caused should not be excessive compared to the good expected from achieving the objective.
b. **Discrimination**: Combatants must distinguish between combatants and non-combatants, avoiding deliberate harm to civilians or non-combatants. Indiscriminate attacks and intentional harm to innocent civilians are considered morally wrong.
The just war theory is not a call for war but rather a framework for evaluating the morality of resorting to war and the conduct during wartime. It acknowledges the reality of the fallen world and recognizes that sometimes wars may be unavoidable to protect innocent lives or defend against aggression. However, it emphasizes the importance of adhering to ethical principles and considering the consequences of war on human life and dignity.
In modern times, the just war theory remains a topic of discussion and debate among ethicists, theologians, and policymakers as they grapple with the complexities of international conflicts and military interventions.
It is evident that the Great Reset is not a just war, but a Satanic enterprise of enslavement of humanity for the benefit of a class of psychopaths who may believe they are following the commands of God, but their methods and arrogance betray them. If anything, they have created a world that resembles that described by the great prophets of the Old Testament, Isaiah and Jeremiah especially.
Just as John F. Kennedy and Kruschev “did unto each other” in the Cuban missile crisis, honoring the other’s desire for a safe margin, the Neocons have broken every agreement regarding NATO expansion in the past three decades, as I point out in the post below.
But what most in the West fail to apprehend is that the Neocons’ plans are to destroy much of the modern world, through plagues, war, and the other aforementioned forms of mischief, to return it to a feudal state with them as the lords and ladies — but the rest of the world increasingly sees it this way. The Western elites have been so thoroughly bribed that they are able to censor the truth from getting out to a great extent. And many are simply too comfortable to care. Surely there is a jus ad bellum for the common people of the world against the World Economic Forum, the Plutocrats who are quite openly pursuing their evil conquest.
But judgment befell the Israelis in 70 A.D., and judgment is likely to befall the Plutocrats who have made Isaiah and Jeremiah so apropos in the West today. God is not on their side.
In the book of Jeremiah in the Old Testament, there are several passages that talk about the coming destruction of Jerusalem. One notable passage is from Jeremiah 6:6-8:
"This is what the Lord Almighty says:
'Cut down the trees
and build siege ramps against Jerusalem.
This city must be punished;
it is filled with oppression.
As a well pours out its water,
so she pours out her wickedness.
Violence and destruction resound in her;
her sickness and wounds are ever before me.
Take warning, Jerusalem,
or I will turn away from you
and make your land desolate
so no one can live in it.'"This passage highlights God's warning to Jerusalem about the impending destruction by the Romans due to its wickedness, violence, and oppression. Jeremiah, as a prophet, was tasked with delivering these messages of judgment to the people, calling for repentance and turning back to God to avoid the coming disaster.
Is any nation free from judgment? No. Certainly not the imperialists of the West. This is not the moment in history to insist on maintaining “unipolar dominance.” The “Manifest Destiny” of the Neocons is likely to be destruction. We all would do better following the golden rule.
Have a blessed day!